A contractor discussion should consider more than price or allocation ratios. Review verifiable company information, scope, technical expectations and process responsibilities together.
In this article
Different proposals may rely on different property information and assumptions. Prepare a shared starting file so the conversation is based on comparable facts.
Organise the information
List available property documents and unresolved questions. Do not present assumptions about technical or legal status as established facts. Consult the relevant authorised organisations and current official information for formal processes.
Clarify the claimed experience
Ask what role the company performed in each example. Consultancy, construction and digital-platform work are different activities. A reference should describe the actual responsibility rather than imply a broader role.
Put expectations in writing
Agree a basis for comparing scope with suitable professional input. Promotional images are not technical designs or permissions. The written proposal should explain what is included and what remains unresolved.
Ask consistent questions
- What facts and assumptions support the proposal?
- What is included and excluded?
- How can claimed roles be verified?
- Which decisions does the programme depend on?
- How will changes and communication be recorded?
The first meeting does not replace legal and technical review of a contract. This checklist supports an organised discussion; it does not guarantee the suitability of a contractor or a particular outcome.
Frequently asked questions
Should allocation ratio alone determine selection?
No. Scope, technical expectations, company information and contractual conditions need joint consideration.
Is consultancy equivalent to a completed construction reference?
No. The role and responsibilities should be stated accurately.
Sources and further reading
Prepared by the Göktürk Han editorial team for general information. Project-specific design, permits and technical decisions require current official documentation and qualified professional assessment.
Last updated: